Skip to content

Conversation

MatthieuMordrel
Copy link

@MatthieuMordrel MatthieuMordrel commented Oct 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Fixed a typo in the migration guide from Hono to Elysia, improving clarity and professionalism.
    • Polished phrasing in the performance comparison to better reflect intent and readability.
    • No changes to behavior, APIs, or configuration; this is a text-only adjustment.
    • Improves guidance for users following migration steps without affecting builds, runtime, or compatibility.
    • No breaking changes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Walkthrough

A single documentation typo was corrected in docs/migrate/from-hono.md, changing “beter” to “better.” No functional, structural, or behavioral code changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Docs typo fix
docs/migrate/from-hono.md
Corrected a misspelling (“beter” → “better”) in migration docs text.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A nibble of text, a letter set right,
I twitch my nose at a tiny bite.
From “beter” to “better,” hop-hop—done!
Docs now shine beneath the sun.
Carrot checkmarks: ✅🥕 concise delight.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The pull request title is "typo," which technically refers to a real aspect of the changeset—the PR does fix a typo. However, the title is extremely vague and generic; it provides no specific information about which typo was corrected, where it was located, or what the context is. While it's not completely off-topic or unrelated, it falls short of the clarity and specificity needed for a teammate scanning PR history to understand the primary change. The title uses a non-descriptive term that doesn't convey meaningful information beyond indicating the general category of change. Consider revising the title to be more specific and descriptive, such as "Fix typo in migration guide: 'beter' to 'better'" or "Correct spelling in from-hono.md documentation." This would provide clear context about what was changed and help other developers quickly understand the PR's purpose when reviewing history.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d2186d and 7ab1431.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/migrate/from-hono.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/migrate/from-hono.md (1)

1457-1457: Typo fix looks good.

Correcting the wording improves clarity.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant